NeeStaNan-Development-Plan, via https://neestanan.ca/
First Nations coalition revives plan for Arctic energy port on Hudson Bay
A coalition of 11 Manitoba First Nations is moving forward with a proposal to build an energy terminal at Port Nelson on Hudson Bay, reviving a plan first envisioned more than a century ago.
The NeeStaNan Development Plan aims to export energy to Europe and even Brazil through a new northern corridor. Backers say the project would provide an alternative to existing export routes through the United States and expand Canada’s access to global markets.
Port Nelson was initially proposed as a key hub for Canadian exports, but was abandoned in 1918 due to construction challenges. The new proposal updates the vision with Indigenous leadership and modern technology.
The terminal would be supplied by a new pipeline transporting Alberta natural gas through Manitoba, potentially connecting with existing infrastructure owned by TC Energy or the Alliance Pipeline operated by Pembina Pipeline. A partially built railbed from the early 1900s could also support LNG shipments from Regina.
Proponents say the location at Port Nelson has advantages over Churchill, which is currently Canada’s only Arctic deepwater port. Unlike Churchill, which is limited by freshwater ice and seasonal access, Port Nelson could operate year-round with the use of modern icebreakers. Supporters say deeper water, improved dredging and floating wharf technology would address the challenges that halted the original development.
The project comes as European countries seek alternatives to Russian energy and as demand grows for Canadian liquefied natural gas. The proposal also includes economic opportunities for Indigenous communities and aims to support trade diversification while advancing reconciliation.
The plan faces regulatory, environmental and financial challenges, but the coalition is asking Canadians to support the First Nations-led project.
If successful, Port Nelson could become a strategic northern export route for Canadian resources, more than 100 years after it was first proposed.
Comments